Hometransalt.org
Bicycle Blueprint
Introduction

NYC Cycling
1. NYC Bike Policy
State of NYC Cycling
3. Cyclists & Streets
A Bike and a Prayer


Riding Infrastructure
4. Street Design
5. Bridges
6. Road Surfaces
7. Greenways
8. Parks
9. Bicycles and Transit
10. Reducing Traffic


Security
11. Bicycle Theft
12. On-Street Parking
13. Indoor Parking


On the Job Cycling
14. Bicycle Messengers
Fifth, Park & Madison
15. Freight Cycles
16. Gov't Cycling


Reducing Risks
17. Accidents
Three Who Died
18. Air Pollution


Bicycle Education
19. Schools
20. Public Education


Appendices

      Chapter 2:
State of Cycling in New York City
a) State of Cycling in New York
b) Current Ridership
c) Would-Be Ridership
d) Public Perception of Cycling
e) Cyling's Untapped Potential
 Table 2: Interest in Bike Commuting According to Trip Distance

TABLE 2b: Interest in Bike Commuting According to Trip Distance

Distance (1-way) Respondents to Survey Number Who Would Commute Percent Who Would Commute
0-5 Miles 369 165 45%
5-10 Miles 319 171 54%
0-10 Miles (subtotal) 688 336 49%
> 10 Miles 1,592 310 19%
Total 2,280 646 28%

Data compiled from NYC DoT report, Improving Manhattan Traffic and Air Quality Conditions — Effectiveness of Bicycle Programs, Sept. 1990. Percentages denote respondents who would bike to work if “bicycle lanes were painted on the street, you could bring your bicycle into the building that you work in, and facilities to shower and change clothes were provided at work.”

DoT distributed 22,700 survey questionnaires to 12 Manhattan business firms (2,000 per firm, except 700 to one smaller firm) participating in the agency's Project SMART (Strategies for Mobility and Reduction of Traffic). While the 2,280 completed responses indicate a nominal 10% response rate, the effective response rate is higher insofar as not all employees necessarily received survey forms. DoT wisely omitted any mention of bicycles from the survey heading, to avoid biasing responses toward bicycle enthusiasts.

Survey is summarized in DoT report, although responses are not broken out by distance. For breakout as above, see Nov. 29, 1990 letter from Transportation Alternatives to DoT Assistant Commissioner Gerard Soffian, and confirmatory response dated Jan. 3, 1991. See also “Commuters to DoT: We're Ready When You Are,” City Cyclist, Jan/Feb 1991, p. 3.





a) State of Cycling in New York
b) Current Ridership
c) Would-Be Ridership
d) Public Perception of Cycling
e) Cyling's Untapped Potential
 Table 2: Interest in Bike Commuting According to Trip Distance

© 1997-2008 Transportation Alternatives
127 West 26th Street, Suite 1002
New York, NY 10001