May/June
1998, p.7
Metropolitan
Highways
New Highway: Government Panacea is Environmental Poison
What do you get when the NJDOT and the NJ Turnpike Authority promote building
a new superhighway, but their plan is opposed by nearby communities and nearly
every major environmental group? Answer: Route 92, the new $300 million, 6
mile expressway in Middlesex County, NJ, of course. While several local
east-west roadways do suffer from congestion problems, bisecting a
state-designated "Environmentally Sensitive Planning Area" of farms,
wetlands, and forest with pavement has not proven itself to be a cogent
solution. DOT's own projections show congestion "relief" to be
uncertain, even without considering the new travel demand to be induced, a big
concern in the fast-growing Middlesex County. The DOT says the road
"respects the State Plan goals to 'Conserve the State's Natural
Resources, Protect the Environment, and Ensure Sound and Integrated Planning
Statewide'." Even Gov. Whitman is in on the double-speak act, being
anti-sprawl and a friend of the environment on one hand, while on the other
hand her administration works overtime to speed the project toward
construction.
Read the latest news about
this issue.
HOV: No
Good Growth
NYS DOT statistics show no growth in usage of the much-ballyhooed LIE HOV
lanes since June 1996. Further, there is no data suggesting the HOV lanes are
creating new carpools. Interpretation: remove multi-occupant vehicles from
regular lanes, and more room opens up for solo drivers. Result: more traffic,
more pollution, more vehicles into NYC, and more congestion on local LI
streets. Meanwhile, Queens activists, like the 89 members of the Queens Civic
Congress, are resisting the LIE HOV eastward expansion.
Read the latest news about
this issue.
M-O-R-E
R-O-A-D Spells R-E-L-I-E-F
The NYS DOT projects that additional lane construction on the Staten Island
Expressway will afford considerable "congestion relief." However,
when pressed, project leaders conceded that the projections assumed existence
of a second Goethals Bridge and widening of the West Shore Expressway.
Provisions for car and truck trips induced by the added road capacity were not
taken into account. One citizen's observation: "I don't see how
encouraging people to get into cars will help at all." The study's
advisory committee and focus groups have supported transit options, including
light rail, and were highly skeptical of adding more highway lanes. Based on
past experience, residents will have to fight hard to choose their pain
reliever: M-O-R-E O-P-T-I-O-N-S.
Read the latest news about
this issue.
Transit
Tidbits
- In January 1998 NYC
Transit carried an extra 12 million passengers compared to 1997. Weekend
ridership jumped 30% on buses and 9% on trains. Meanwhile, the LIRR posted
its third best year since 1955.
- The glimmer of hope for
lower east side rail may fade fast, as politicos and some planners say
it's a bad idea.
- The NYC Partnership and
Chamber of Commerce report that state transit funding trends favor
suburban commuters at the expense of city transit riders.
- Bikes will now be allowed
on off peak NJ Transit trains on the Morris & Essex line. The two bike
per train limit remains in force.
- The 7 and 6 trains, and 30
bus routes will "get back" rush hour service which was cut in
1995, thanks in large part to unions, advocates and others who fought for
an extra $15 million in the state's budget.
Read the latest news about
this issue.
|